![]() |
Is this true?
I read somewhere that if you count the total number of leaves that a Banana has had it should bloom around leaf # 35. Is this an average or true or just totally made up? Thanks
|
Re: Is this true?
I've read something similar, but I thought it was more like 40.
|
Re: Is this true?
Quote:
|
Re: Is this true?
Quote:
|
Re: Is this true?
OK, I'll bite. Does overwintering increase or decrease the number of leaves before blooming? It is not obvious to me, since stress has been known to trigger "premature" blooming.
Ed. |
Re: Is this true?
Really though, doesn't the 30-40 range really represent the strength and size of the P-Stem and thus the ability to bear fruit? No matter if it was continuous or got overwintered? Or am i wrong...
|
Re: Is this true?
This counting leaves business has come up several times. It is not a reliable way to predict blooming, just saying that a banana will fruit after so many leaves. However, if you were to track the number of leaves a particular variety makes before flowering in your specific growing conditions, and you were able to repeat this many times you would probably be able to come up with a good average of how many leaves a specific variety must make before flowering. If you were able to go this far, then you would just as easily be able to say how much active growing time is required (which is just a different unit for the same measurement as counting leaves). There are stats on how many leaves a plant has made before flowering, but that doesn't necessarily mean that it requires that amount to flower, or that after reaching that number it will begin to flower. A leaf count may be handy if you have a lot of starts and stops in your growing cycles, but I haven't seen any research into this area. Since there is so much diversity between varieties and so much diversity in growing conditions, it is very unreliable to say that "bananas in general" will flower after however many leaves.
|
Re: Is this true?
Quote:
You should see some of the frail 2 foot tall plants that have fruited tiny bunches of useless bananas that don't mature, but rather rot on the undersized, under sunned, generally malnourished plant. When i arrived here the preexisting growth was unkempt, the pups were never removed, so some areas had 5 or 6 plants growing out of one corm mass all at different stages of development, but only the two or three biggest getting what they needed to prosper. the rest would spend months in the shadows of the larger plants and by the time the larger fruited and were removed, it was too late for the smaller ones to recover in any meaningful way before it was their time to fruit. I'm just glad that my chickens will eat any of these that come about. It would be a real shame to just toss them to the ants. |
Re: Is this true?
Which area are you in - Revolutionman???
|
Re: Is this true?
I'm a short raft ride away from Santo Domingo on the west coast of PR.
|
Re: Is this true?
Well if this were semi-true (and Gabe wasn't absolutely correct (he is though)) there would be a vast difference from a corm fed pup to a T/C plant. I would be willing to bet a T/C has an extra 15-20 (and possibly more) leaves versus a corm fed pup prior to maturity. :^)
|
Re: Is this true?
in my area of mexico, the farmers count the current number of leaves to determine if there will be a harvestable bunch...if over 12 leaves, very good...if under 8 (due to disease in the plantation), cut it down and burn the affected plant...
nobody here has time to count leaves during the year... |
Re: Is this true?
Quote:
|
Re: Is this true?
Quote:
But another question: For which variety do you need at least 12 leaves to have a good, harvestable bunch? Is it some guideline: If it doesn't have at least 12 leaves, chop it down and burn? Does it always have to be some disease? Also, what is the optimal number of leaves for extremely good quality of fruit? I guess the more the better, but at some point many of those leaves become redundant and take more energy than give back, don't they? I can't imagine a banana with say 20 green leaves. Quote:
|
Re: Is this true?
the bunch that develops with fewer leaves (other leaves having been lost to the dreaded fungus) will have far fewer bananas than others, but would continue to require the same amount of labor
the farmers constantly cut away sections of affected leaves and move the debris away from the base for burning...quite a site to see such sharp machetes reach overhead and flick off a bit here or there corms are cut away with the resulting survivor being optimally placed in regards to other plants and thus avoiding overcrowding |
Re: Is this true?
Quote:
Since banana bunches are initiated months before you see them, and the number and potential size of the fruits are determined based on the state of the plant during initiation, it is possible that the state and conditions of the plant will be significantly different than what they were during initiation. For For example, the plant could have made a bunch expecting that it will have 12 functional leaves to support it throughout its development, but if something happens (such as disease or high winds), and it does not have those 12 leaves, then the development of the bunch may be affected. If this happens, a general guideline (which really would vary by variety and conditions) is that at least 8 good functional leaves must be present in order to have the bunch properly develop. |
Re: Is this true?
The number of leaves on a banana plant solely depends on all conditions of growth ie climatic,soil nutients and moisture of the soil etc, as such if all conditions are favourable to the plant there bounds to be good yield except when the plant is infected by disease.
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:10 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin Version 3.6.8,
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.
All content © Bananas.org & the respective author.