Bananas.org

Bananas.org vbseo_replace_urls("(", "https://www.bananas.org/index.php"))
-   Main Banana Discussion vbseo_replace_urls("(", "https://www.bananas.org/forumdisplay.php?f=2"))
-   -   Genetically modified bananas vbseo_replace_urls("(", "https://www.bananas.org/showthread.php?t=1278"))

mikevan 11-23-2006 09:24 AM

Re: Genetically modified bananas
 
Well, in the States, those sounding the alarm are the "crack-pots" afraid of change. After all, if it comes from a lab, it must be safe, right? Those in EU resisting GMO are now illegal in their resistance per the WTO. And those countries banning GMO like Brazil are having those bans reversed by activist judges. There's stiff resistance out there - the alarm has already been sounded. But - it doesn't appear to be enough...

Our chickens are factory-farmed, which is why they're tasteless. Give free-range chickens and eggs a try and you'll be surprised at the difference.

As to mad-cow and family - we're just lucky. We bumble as much as any other nation and what gets found is a fraction of what gets thru as with everything else. Not to mention possible suppression of incidents, of which I would not be surprised, knowing some of the ranchers that I do. The elk and deer form is fairly rampant, IIRC. Really sad, this disease.

They're also trying to control water here - making us register our wells and whatnot. But, water falls from the sky, making it harder to control tho in some places it's illegal to collect rain-water! How weird is that. But food has to be produced - if you can centralize the food production and control it and eliminate the competing food-producers, you have the world by the gonads in a way that OPEC has never dreamed. I can walk to work - but I cannot go without food!

Which is why I try to grow as much as I can here and save seeds like mad and concentrate on heirloom crops and varieties on the brink of disappearing.

This is the direction BioTech should have gone in the first place:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisf...931467,00.html

Be well,
Mike

Quote:

Originally Posted by mrbungalow (Post 8631)
Mike, if what you are saying about the government, this agriculture-legislation in Iraq, and the companies using nazi-methods to push GMO on other countries & continents holds water, someone should sound the alarm.

In my country, agriculture is disapperaing. Heard on the news today that there are less than 50.000 farmers left. Remember, farms in Norway are nothing like the ones they have in the US and Canada. Here they are small and more traditional. In food-production, fish-farming is dominant here.

According to the facts of international trade, all countries can benfit from trade, as long as they produce what they are good at. Still, the thing with food is that it''s too important to mess with. It's one of the primary needs. Every country should have their own varied food-production. You should atleast be able to choose.

BTW, who do you guys think is northern europes largest banana-producer? Iceland, actually!

I've lived in the United States for 6 years, and have noticed some differences in several types of food. I think the chicken in america doesn't taste anything really, and is probably 3 times as big as the ones in Norway. But the steaks in america tastes better and are superior to the ones they sell in Norway - atleast in terms of taste. America are said to only have had a very few cases of mad-cow disease, while England and France have had way too many. So you must be doing something right "over there"!


jeffreyp 11-23-2006 09:55 AM

Re: Genetically modified bananas
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by mrbungalow (Post 8631)
BTW, who do you guys think is northern europes largest banana-producer? Iceland, actually!

I've lived in the United States for 6 years, and

I remember reading about Iceland and banana production years ago. I always thought that was an amazing thing they could pull that off. I knew someone who lived in iceland for a while and he said one of his neighbors had an orange tree in their yard. Supposeably the house was near a hot spring and the steam from it kept the surrounding area balmy enough for the tree to grow. I bet the food grown in Iceland is incredibly tastey since it's grown in volcanic soil.

Mr. Bungalow, so you lived in the usa for 6 years? That explains why you speak/write like an american! I was wondering how a norwegian like yourself sounded like one of us? :nanerwizard:

bigdog 11-23-2006 12:31 PM

Re: Genetically modified bananas
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by momoese (Post 8628)
Flame wars aside, you obviously have a personal agenda like most people do, only yours is not the welfare of the earth and the things that live on it, including you and me. Yours is about making money and or fame or possibly immortality through science. I would like to say we should agree to disagree but I don't think in your heart you really believe your own spin.

Mitchell, everyone has their own personal agenda. Here's mine: Try to please God, so He has a smile on His face when I'm at the Gates (I sure don't want to see Him frowning! lol!), graduate from college, maybe get married and have a couple of kids, try to make a positive difference in the world (however small it may be), settle down on a few acres, grow lots of bananas and cold-hardy palms, retire with enough to not worry about my last years on Earth, and die a happy old man. A lot to ask for, I know. I don't know why you would say such bad things about me, Mitchell. Have I done something to you to upset you on a personal level? I've gone back and read my posts, and don't see anywhere that I have personally attacked you. You obviously don't know me, or you would never say that I don't care about "the welfare of the earth and the things that live on it." How can you be sure of such things from my postings on bananas.org? Believe what you want, Mitchell. I know who I am, and don't have to defend myself here. You shouldn't make judgements about people based on 2 posts on a banana forum. It's uncalled for and downright mean. Happy Thanksgiving.

momoese 11-26-2006 08:12 PM

Re: Genetically modified bananas
 
Well I just wrote a whole reply to your post and it disappeared when I clicked submit. Hate that!

Anyway, if my detest of anything GMO hurts your feelings then you have my apologies.

Cheers :nanadrink:

PS: if your going to work in the field of GMO then you will need to grow a thick skin.

bigdog 11-26-2006 09:05 PM

Re: Genetically modified bananas
 
Mitchell, as you know, it's not your detesting of anything GMO that "hurts" my "feelings." You didn't mention anything about GMOs in your attack. You got personal, and you know it. Your half-hearted attemp at an apology is lame. Grow up.

momoese 11-26-2006 11:33 PM

Re: Genetically modified bananas
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by bigdog (Post 8703)
Mitchell, as you know, it's not your detesting of anything GMO that "hurts" my "feelings." You didn't mention anything about GMOs in your attack. You got personal, and you know it. Your half-hearted attemp at an apology is lame. Grow up.

Actually my apology was real. Maybe I'm not the best at expressing it over the internet.

You said a few things that lead me to believe you were not only supporting GMO as being safe, but that you wanted to pursue a career in working with them.

Now get over yourself

mrbungalow 11-27-2006 12:18 PM

Re: Genetically modified bananas
 
Maybe this guy will cheer things up a bit.
http://atvs.vg.no/player/player.php?id=6188

Apparently, making the same noise as the microwave makes this young swedish guy laugh! :cool:

modenacart 11-27-2006 02:42 PM

Re: Genetically modified bananas
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by mikevan (Post 8634)
They're also trying to control water here - making us register our wells and whatnot. But, water falls from the sky, making it harder to control tho in some places it's illegal to collect rain-water! How weird is that.

really? I have never heard of that. Where is that going on?

mikevan 11-27-2006 03:08 PM

Re: Genetically modified bananas
 
Ironically, Washington State has a 1917 law that claims state ownership of rainwater and requires a permit to even put a barrel under a down-spout. Reason given - harvesting even a little bit of rainwater affects aquifers and rivers and they're attempting to defend the water supply for everyone. Strange, for such a wet state. Colorado also has some interesting permit requirements for water-collecting, IIRC. Interestingly, for such a dry state, Texas fortunately encourages rainwater collection. I'm sure there are other restrictions. Some are not state-wide, but rather are by the county. And with the greater demand for a diminishing resource, water is coming under more and more scrutiny as far as control is concerned.

Be well,
Mike

Quote:

Originally Posted by modenacart (Post 8728)
really? I have never heard of that. Where is that going on?


MediaHound 12-03-2006 08:56 AM

Re: Genetically modified bananas
 
I just read this thread again. We may not always agree on things, and GMO is certainly a sensitive subject, but let's try to be more civil with each other. You guys know Gabe and I don't do much intervening but I don't want this thread to get out of hand (though it has been quiet for a bit).
:nanablowskisses:

With talks like these, when nobody gets offended, everyone wins. It stays on topic and more useful information gets passed along.
Thank you for understanding!

GATrops 12-03-2006 01:05 PM

Re: Genetically modified bananas
 
I also have been reading the posts on this thread and cannot believe some of the comments (almost personal attacks) that have been made in some of the messages. You may disagree with someone else’s opinions but if I remember correctly everyone is entitled to their opinion and the right to voice it. Just because you firmly believe something does not necessarily mean it is correct. I find it very disappointing and am not sure if I will continue to participate in the discussions on this board given the lack of respect shown by some of those involved. I am also glad to see that Jarred spoke up to try to bring a voice of reason and respect to the discussions.

monkeypickle 12-08-2006 03:30 PM

Re: Genetically modified bananas
 
Gene modified corn has another drawback for those of us who happen to enjoy the sight of migrating Monarch butterflies. Corn, modified by adding a genetic sequence that allows it to produce Bacillus Thurengiences Kills the larvae of Monarch butterfles. The gene enhanced corn produces pollen that is laced with BT. The pollen dshisces form tne tassel early in the morning while the dew is still on the leaves of the Monarchs favourite food plants. These plants commonly grow in ditches and other waste areas where corn is grown. The pollen adheres to the leaves of the milkweed plants that the larvae require to feed on. The larvae feed upon the leaves and are killed by the BT from the pollen grains. I know that this is true. I researched it and used it as a basis for my Biologymassters theme paper several years ago. Everyone got all upset by it, but guess what. Monsanto filed a lawsuit and everything got all hushed up. Result: You cannot find enough Monarch butterflies migrating through here to fill a decent matchbox, and this used to be a prominent flyway for Monarchs migrating through here in the fall. They used to cover the cedars here for several days. but no more. I haven't seen more than 1 or 2 each fall now for at least 7-8 years. Sigh I surely do miss them. they were sooo beautiful, but aparently also disposable. Monkeypickles It is not just a matter of "will it harm humans." What about "will it cause the extinction of other life forms." True. the Monarch butterfly is just another insect so who cares? But sometimes, the extinction of some seemingly unimportant member of the ecosystem leads to the extinction of another, which leads to the extinction pf another.......until one day maybe, it will make humans life impossible. Oh well. No one ever listens anyway. I am an old duffer, so it probably won't impact me . I'll be gone anyway. Good luck to the rest of you!

bigdog 12-09-2006 12:06 PM

Re: Genetically modified bananas
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by momoese (Post 8618)
Are you scared of organic produce? Didn't think so. There is nothing scary or wrong or politically biased about supporting organic 100%

Organic growing methods have proven over the course of human history to be the right way. There is no reason to look any further.

You can choose to be a part of the solution(organic), or a part of the problem(GMO), the choice is yours.


Thought you might be interested in this article I found today, Mitchell:

Pesticides found in 'organic' food
November 6, 2004
Stuff
Leanne Bell
http://www.stuff.co.nz/stuff/0,2106,3087903a10,00.html
Pesticide residues found in "organic" produce have, according to this story, prompted fresh concerns that New Zealand shoppers are being misled.
The Food Safety Authority was cited as saying shoppers should be aware that some food sold as "organic" might not be produced organically, after taking 41 samples of "organic" fruit, vegetables and wine from shops and found nine of them – 22 per cent – had pesticide residues.
Residues were found in lettuce, tomatoes and grapes. There was so much residue that they had probably been deliberately sprayed, the food safety watchdog said.
Executive director Andrew McKenzie was cited as saying the food was not unsafe but it did not comply with the organic standard, adding, "The sample size is quite small – it's not like a real good scientific study – but it points that there's a bit of a problem." Consumers could have confidence in food that was certified organic, "but if it's not certified, you're not quite sure what's going on. We never differentiated between certified and non-certified, we just went into shops where the consumer would logically think these things were organic."
A spokeswoman was cited as saying that the Commerce Commission, the enforcement agency for the Fair Trading Act, is assessing the information before it decides if it should investigate.
Technical director Seager Mason of organic certifier BioGro New Zealand was cited as criticizing the authority's test because it did not distinguish between certified and self-proclaimed organic foods and that BioGro did more than 250 pesticide residue tests a year on produce and had not found any residues for five years, adding, "I'm sure that test is correct but it means nothing about organics if they have selected a product which has an invalid claim of organic on it."

From:http://archives.foodsafetynetwork.ca...v_8.htm#story1

Seems that the organic industry has its own problems as well. Sounds like some companies are being a bit misleading, trying to pass their product along as "organic," when in fact it isn't.

Both industries have their own, separate problems to deal with, and to overcome. There is room for both.

bigdog 12-09-2006 12:31 PM

Re: Genetically modified bananas
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by monkeypickle (Post 9063)
Gene modified corn has another drawback for those of us who happen to enjoy the sight of migrating Monarch butterflies. Corn, modified by adding a genetic sequence that allows it to produce Bacillus Thurengiences Kills the larvae of Monarch butterfles. The gene enhanced corn produces pollen that is laced with BT. The pollen dshisces form tne tassel early in the morning while the dew is still on the leaves of the Monarchs favourite food plants. These plants commonly grow in ditches and other waste areas where corn is grown. The pollen adheres to the leaves of the milkweed plants that the larvae require to feed on. The larvae feed upon the leaves and are killed by the BT from the pollen grains. I know that this is true. I researched it and used it as a basis for my Biologymassters theme paper several years ago. Everyone got all upset by it, but guess what. Monsanto filed a lawsuit and everything got all hushed up. Result: You cannot find enough Monarch butterflies migrating through here to fill a decent matchbox, and this used to be a prominent flyway for Monarchs migrating through here in the fall. They used to cover the cedars here for several days. but no more. I haven't seen more than 1 or 2 each fall now for at least 7-8 years. Sigh I surely do miss them. they were sooo beautiful, but aparently also disposable. Monkeypickles It is not just a matter of "will it harm humans." What about "will it cause the extinction of other life forms." True. the Monarch butterfly is just another insect so who cares? But sometimes, the extinction of some seemingly unimportant member of the ecosystem leads to the extinction of another, which leads to the extinction pf another.......until one day maybe, it will make humans life impossible. Oh well. No one ever listens anyway. I am an old duffer, so it probably won't impact me . I'll be gone anyway. Good luck to the rest of you!

Monkeypickles (great name, btw!), I did a little research on your findings, and it seems that there was a very extensive study done on this since yours. You'll be happy to know that their results reported that BT corn poses no significant risk to monarch butterflies! I thought that was good news, because I was concerned after reading your post. Here's a little excerpt from the USDA report:

There is no significant risk to monarch butterflies from environmental exposure to Bt corn, according to research conducted by a group of scientists coordinated by the Agricultural Research Service (ARS), U.S. Department of Agriculture. This research was published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS).

That Bt corn might present a risk became a matter of scientific and public concern when a small experiment in 1999 indicated caterpillars suffered when given no choice but to feed on milkweed leaves heavily dusted with Bt corn pollen.


The full story can be found here: http://www.ars.usda.gov/is/br/btcorn/index.html#bt1

Certainly good news!

Gabe15 12-09-2006 12:33 PM

Re: Genetically modified bananas
 
Good article Frank, this is the kinda thing bananas are facing. Even organic bananas cannot escape all the pesticide spraying that must be done on a weekly basis to prevent mainly Black Sigatoka infections. This is the whole problem facing export bananas right now, they already have to spray way too many chemicals just to keep the sigatoka at bay, and then once Panama Disease Race 4 comes over to the Americas, there will be no way to stop it, the Cavendish is not resistant and pesticides do not work. Whats the answer? Either spend millions trying to genetically modify the Cavendish, or just replace them all with something like 'Goldfinger' which already exists and is a proven winner.

mikevan 12-09-2006 12:47 PM

Re: Genetically modified bananas
 
That is a problem with a lax certifying agency and unscrupulous growers looking to make more money with a label and hoping not to get caught. As with everything else in this world, it's buyer beware, unfortunately, in this world of greed, and there are members in any industry that are willing to use dishonesty to make a quick buck - not just farmers seeking to sell for more with the Organic label. I for one would like to see Organic sold for less than non-Organic - that would eliminate that kind of fraud for the most part and, after all, Organic is less costly to produce in the first place. That won't happen until supply catches up with demand and production becomes more local rather than distantly distributed. In the meantime, the safest way to have Organic with complete assurance is to grow it yourself. Nevertheless, even with a bit of salt, you'll still hopefully be more lucky buying organic than not - widespread industry-wide fraud cannot be hidden for long. And it helps if the buyer is alert and more than willing to be heard by the right people, organic or not.

Now, if they'd just stop feeding cattle corn and eliminate this e-coli problem - that interestingly seems to be plaguing non-Organic farms in California almost exclusively.

Mike

Quote:

Originally Posted by bigdog (Post 9097)
Thought you might be interested in this article I found today, Mitchell:

Pesticides found in 'organic' food
November 6, 2004
Stuff
Leanne Bell
http://www.stuff.co.nz/stuff/0,2106,3087903a10,00.html
Pesticide residues found in "organic" produce have, according to this story, prompted fresh concerns that New Zealand shoppers are being misled.
The Food Safety Authority was cited as saying shoppers should be aware that some food sold as "organic" might not be produced organically, after taking 41 samples of "organic" fruit, vegetables and wine from shops and found nine of them – 22 per cent – had pesticide residues.
Residues were found in lettuce, tomatoes and grapes. There was so much residue that they had probably been deliberately sprayed, the food safety watchdog said.
Executive director Andrew McKenzie was cited as saying the food was not unsafe but it did not comply with the organic standard, adding, "The sample size is quite small – it's not like a real good scientific study – but it points that there's a bit of a problem." Consumers could have confidence in food that was certified organic, "but if it's not certified, you're not quite sure what's going on. We never differentiated between certified and non-certified, we just went into shops where the consumer would logically think these things were organic."
A spokeswoman was cited as saying that the Commerce Commission, the enforcement agency for the Fair Trading Act, is assessing the information before it decides if it should investigate.
Technical director Seager Mason of organic certifier BioGro New Zealand was cited as criticizing the authority's test because it did not distinguish between certified and self-proclaimed organic foods and that BioGro did more than 250 pesticide residue tests a year on produce and had not found any residues for five years, adding, "I'm sure that test is correct but it means nothing about organics if they have selected a product which has an invalid claim of organic on it."

From:http://archives.foodsafetynetwork.ca...v_8.htm#story1

Seems that the organic industry has its own problems as well. Sounds like some companies are being a bit misleading, trying to pass their product along as "organic," when in fact it isn't.

Both industries have their own, separate problems to deal with, and to overcome. There is room for both.


imdocrob 12-09-2006 12:50 PM

Re: Genetically modified bananas
 
I agree with Gabe the simple solution is to replace the Cav. with the Goldfinger, but when we look at the big pic. isn't the Goldfinger a genetically modified banana from Honduras? The world has changed a lot from the Idustrial age due to the wonders of Science. I feel that if these labs are govt. monitored are we not going to be better off? After all isn't just a matter of time before something will come along that the Goldfinger will not be able to be resistant against. The key is to be open-minded.

Gabe15 12-09-2006 12:55 PM

Re: Genetically modified bananas
 
The 'Goldfinger' as well as anything from FHIA are not GMO, they were produced through years of conventional breeding, as in pollen transfer and seed harvest, just like early bananas were produced by nature.

mikevan 12-09-2006 01:12 PM

Re: Genetically modified bananas
 
Heh - you kidding? I keep wondering if the labs should be monitoring the government! :04:

The biggest problem is the tendency to focus on ubiquitous clones rather than even a diversity of clones. If the market were used to a more diverse nanner, preventing disaster would be easier than trying to produce that boring yeller 9" long grocery nanner. Thusly, with a very small number of parents being widely cloned, the prospects of disaster is much higher. A greater diversity in nanners - even if cloned - would reduce the catastrophic effect of disease, IMHO. And of course replacing and infusing selectively bred refreshments to the gene-pool. So, our main problem isn't the disease, but the lack of genetic diversity thru agricultural practices that unfortunately are dictated by the preconceptions of a finicky market.

Be well,
Mike

Quote:

Originally Posted by imdocrob (Post 9102)
I agree with Gabe the simple solution is to replace the Cav. with the Goldfinger, but when we look at the big pic. isn't the Goldfinger a genetically modified banana from Honduras? The world has changed a lot from the Idustrial age due to the wonders of Science. I feel that if these labs are govt. monitored are we not going to be better off? After all isn't just a matter of time before something will come along that the Goldfinger will not be able to be resistant against. The key is to be open-minded.


bigdog 12-09-2006 01:20 PM

Re: Genetically modified bananas
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Gabe15 (Post 9100)
Whats the answer? Either spend millions trying to genetically modify the Cavendish, or just replace them all with something like 'Goldfinger' which already exists and is a proven winner.

Man, isn't that the truth! The whole ridiculous idea that consumers won't warm up to a different banana seems a bit absurd to me. I think that's the primary reason that Cavendish is still THE banana found in supermarkets. With so many great varieties out there, seems like diversity in the supermarket would be a good thing for the industry.

Gabe15 12-09-2006 01:24 PM

Re: Genetically modified bananas
 
Mike you have hit the nail on the head. All over the world, many different banana varieties are grown, no other banana production system is as boring as the export bananas. This is the proposal that has been brought up countless times, if the current variety isnt working replace it with a different variety, doesnt sound so hard because its not. But there is a huge force that is stopping this from happening, and that is the industry is afraid that consumers will not like a new bananas, well thats just bullocks because they already did it in Australia, and guess what, no one cared! Infact they liked the new Goldfinger. Their only excuse to not replace the Cavendish is really just a lame excuse to give the GMO companies some business. Ive said it before though, GMO may have other great applications in improving the banana, but in my opinion its not the wisest thing to do and this point in time for the export industry (which actually when you look at the numbers is only 13% of worldwide banana production so in the end its not even the biggest issue facing bananas).

imdocrob 12-09-2006 01:52 PM

Re: Genetically modified bananas
 
I don't think that if we replaced the Cavendish with the Goldfinger or any other banana that the majority of the people out there would even have a clue. Thanks Gabe for correcting me on the Goldfinger.

imdocrob 12-09-2006 01:54 PM

Re: Genetically modified bananas
 
By the way Gabe how does one get the pic to come up under your name on these posts?

monkeypickle 12-11-2006 04:53 PM

Re: Genetically modified bananas
 
So glad to hear that bt corn is not killing Monarch butterflies, but,er...where ARE all the butterflies? hmmmm

you know what? why don't some of you who have a large number of unusual varieties of edible bananas get yourselves together and have a 'banana taste-off' or something to let people know what thry are missing out on?There are probably a lot of people out there who would like some of the 'new' varieties to start asking for them? what do you all think. The tomato people are doing that and the result is that seeds of antique [but wonderfull] varieties are again being carried in seed stores.

mikevan 12-11-2006 05:29 PM

Re: Genetically modified bananas
 
While the tomato enthusiasts have kept heirloom tomatoes alive and a diversity in seed stores, it's the grocery produce section that bananas reside and grocery managers that tend to stick with what they're comfortable with and used to, as well as with what has a regular supply of. There are a few pro-active grocers out there that actually do carry a small diversity of nanners from what I've read, but the overwhelming majority are only interested in boxes and boxes of the traditional yeller nanners - change is risky for them and money lost while waiting for it to catch on, taste-offs or no. Also, the tropical farmer is the one who provides the nanners and precious few of them are interested in growing a large diversity of nanners with no guarantee of sales - only breeders maintain a diversity. They focus on what makes money and that's the boring grocery-store nanner. So, even if we did do taste-offs, I doubt many of us would make any difference when our grocery nanners come from another part of the world that most of us have little contact with.

Be well,
Mike

Quote:

Originally Posted by monkeypickle (Post 9182)
So glad to hear that bt corn is not killing Monarch butterflies, but,er...where ARE all the butterflies? hmmmm

you know what? why don't some of you who have a large number of unusual varieties of edible bananas get yourselves together and have a 'banana taste-off' or something to let people know what thry are missing out on?There are probably a lot of people out there who would like some of the 'new' varieties to start asking for them? what do you all think. The tomato people are doing that and the result is that seeds of antique [but wonderfull] varieties are again being carried in seed stores.


JoeReal 12-11-2006 06:32 PM

Re: Genetically modified bananas
 
Sorry, can't resist. How about these ones?

Banana-Melon from Chiquita!


Banana-Kiwi


Banana-Pineapple

mikevan 12-11-2006 07:01 PM

Re: Genetically modified bananas
 
LOL! Where's the beef nanner tho? Or chicken nanners? Hey, everything tastes like chicken anyway, right? :)

Grin,
Mike

Quote:

Originally Posted by JoeReal (Post 9188)
Sorry, can't resist. How about these ones?


monkeypickle 12-12-2006 09:06 AM

Re: Genetically modified bananas
 
Yuuuck! Chicken nanners sounds downright disgusting to me, but...hows about lime/coconut bananas or orange Papaya?:2236:

GAPEye 12-12-2006 07:43 PM

Re: Genetically modified bananas
 
My Vote Goes To The "WMN" = WaterMelon Nanner :2791:

Anaxagoras 02-18-2010 04:14 AM

Re: Genetically modified bananas
 
This is a good thread. I learned some nuances of this problem.

Bananaman88 02-18-2010 12:49 PM

Re: Genetically modified bananas
 
I agree with Frank; it's ridiculous to think that the American consumer would freak out if a different banana were offered. I mean, they already had to adapt once from the 'Gros Michel' to the Cavendish, so what's the difference now? I'd love to be able to go into my local supermarket and have four or five different banana cultivars to choose from. I think finding ones that ship well is another piece of the puzzle. The big banana companies just don't seem to want to take the chance. Too bad for us-and them.

Richard 02-18-2010 02:02 PM

Re: Genetically modified bananas
 
Here's a company in the business of testing for GMO plants:
GMO Testing

Nicolas Naranja 02-18-2010 03:36 PM

Re: Genetically modified bananas
 
Wow,

Apparently I missed out on a really heated GMO conversation. I have a vested interest in the whole GMO debate, which comes from my own health and the reality of food production. I live across the street from some farmland that gets sprayed by air on a regular basis. The plane flies over my house and drops down to about 10-15' to start spraying about 100' from the end of my driveway. The first house I had in town he would actually start spraying at the end of my backyard. And we aren't talking about benign chemicals either, things like Chlorpyrifos, Parathion, and Methomyl. If farmers down here could use Bt(GMO) sweet corn those chemicals wouldn't be getting sprayed. And I'll bet if you asked the guys that lived around or in banana plantations if they would rather have GMO bananas that didn't have to be sprayed or have bananas that had to sprayed every two weeks I guarantee they would rather have the ones that weren't sprayed. Sure we would all like to go organic, but it just isn't totally feasible. Think about how many cows would be required to produce the manure required to switch the world to organic production. Somebody has already done the math behind it, and you would need billions more animals to make the manure required. Chemical fertilizer has saved more people from starvation than anything else, and right behind that you have agrochemicals. If you have ever had to hoe a crop like bananas, peanuts or cotton you would also readily appreciate things like herbicides that make the job much easier.

You know what really irks me: People that have never spent time farming who want me to use composted manure, manual weeding, and just accept the inevitable loss due to disease and then they want to pay the same price for it.

Question: What's the bigger moral hazard GMO crops grown in your region or organic tomatoes picked by children 100s of miles away?

Bananaman88 02-18-2010 03:47 PM

Re: Genetically modified bananas
 
Interesting points, Nicolas.

harveyc 02-23-2010 04:54 PM

Re: Genetically modified bananas
 
Sorry, perhaps a bit off-topic, but we maybe could just get organic "California" bananas from China...


dana mastro 10-16-2013 01:00 PM

Re: Genetically modified bananas
 
okay well to answer your post first question commercially they grow Cavendish but some producers grow genetically modified Cavendish's its called the double mahoi YES this banana is actually a genetically modified Cavendish it grows 2 bunches of bananas at a time and there have been records of some doing three and even a dwarf 4th so u can see why they would want to do this for mass production. banana facts :)

servatusprime 10-16-2013 01:27 PM

Re: Genetically modified bananas
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by dana mastro (Post 231484)
okay well to answer your post first question commercially they grow Cavendish but some producers grow genetically modified Cavendish's its called the double mahoi YES this banana is actually a genetically modified Cavendish it grows 2 bunches of bananas at a time and there have been records of some doing three and even a dwarf 4th so u can see why they would want to do this for mass production. banana facts :)

Can you show me where you got the information stating that its a GMO? Thank you. (i am currently growing it)


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:00 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.6.8, Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.
All content © Bananas.org & the respective author.