View Full Version : Musella Lasiocarpa now a Musa
JoeS475
10-15-2006, 06:14 PM
I guess this is a new development? details on the RHS site:
http://www.rhs.org.uk/Learning/publications/pubs/garden0502/bananas.asp
~Joe
Zac in NC
10-15-2006, 06:58 PM
Well, that site is from 2002 and I don't know if all botanists would accept that. I know that I don't accept it( and I am just a few years away from having a degree and being an actual Botanist by profession). I am very skeptical about this also, because I haven't seen a scientific journal article about it. That is what I really use to go by when it comes to changes in nomenclature like that.
Gabe- had you seen this before? What does Markku say about it?
Zac
bigdog
10-15-2006, 07:16 PM
I'm very skeptical about that also. Supposedly, there has been another species of Musella discovered in North Vietnam, so it may not be a monotypic genus after alll. Where are their references? Who reclassified it and why? Too much missing information there.
Gabe15
10-16-2006, 11:08 AM
There are 2 species of Musella, Musella lasiocarpa and Musella splendida, and yes they are different. They are still in their own genus, nothing has changed for a few years. If anything they are closer to Ensete, not Musa. Infact they should cross fairly easily, Ensete x Musella, but not Musa x Musella.
tropicalkid
10-20-2006, 12:22 PM
Gabe:
What are the differences between Musella lasiocarpa and splendida?
Flower/fruit wise?
Carlos
Zac in NC
10-20-2006, 12:50 PM
Carlos- I know splendida is from Vietnam. I think the bracts are a little longer, at least from what I have seen on the internet.
Zac
Gabe15
10-20-2006, 01:26 PM
I know it is a larger plant, but I have not seen the full description, only a few pictures.
vBulletin® v3.6.8, Copyright ©2000-2020, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.