Bananas.org - View Single Post

Funkthulhu · 06-18-2014, 11:19 AM

You pull out as ridiculous a website as IceAgeNow.com and expect to make your case with it? Get real.

Sorry, you're still wrong and all of your arguments against me and Anthropogenic Global Climate Change are more or less logical fallacies of argument. (Dragging out Al Gore again? Really? Guy hasn't even done anything for 5 years...)

Peer-reviewed means that it is a scientifically produced paper with research and testable findings that has been reviewed by peers of that scientific branch before publication. It's really not that hard. Think of it as a newspaper reporter asking a couple guys around the office if his new article is factual or not. (and your articles didn't)

But, as we've already discussed and pointed out. When your denial of fact is based on religious/political/economic-agenda dogma there is no amount of hard science that will ever make you change your mind. Your basis for denial is not based in fact or logic, so using those tools to convince you that you are wrong will do no good.

The argument is still over, those who are doing the research are moving on to fixing the problem instead of squabbling over its existence. No amount of "no it isn't!" with you, here, is ever going to change that. However, we live in a (mostly) free world. So if you want to believe the sky is orange and there are elves that steal your socks at night, go right ahead. I won't stop you.

06-18-2014, 11:19 AM	#588 (permalink)
Funkthulhu Laeti vescimur nos subact Location: Omaha, NE Find me on the map! Zone: 5b Join Date: Jun 2013 Posts: 223 BananaBucks : 25,589 Feedback: 0 / 0% Said "Thanks" 163 Times Was Thanked 330 Times in 145 Posts Said "Welcome to Bananas" 1 Times	Re: Climate change hoax exposed? You pull out as ridiculous a website as IceAgeNow.com and expect to make your case with it? Get real. Sorry, you're still wrong and all of your arguments against me and Anthropogenic Global Climate Change are more or less logical fallacies of argument. (Dragging out Al Gore again? Really? Guy hasn't even done anything for 5 years...) Peer-reviewed means that it is a scientifically produced paper with research and testable findings that has been reviewed by peers of that scientific branch before publication. It's really not that hard. Think of it as a newspaper reporter asking a couple guys around the office if his new article is factual or not. (and your articles didn't) But, as we've already discussed and pointed out. When your denial of fact is based on religious/political/economic-agenda dogma there is no amount of hard science that will ever make you change your mind. Your basis for denial is not based in fact or logic, so using those tools to convince you that you are wrong will do no good. The argument is still over, those who are doing the research are moving on to fixing the problem instead of squabbling over its existence. No amount of "no it isn't!" with you, here, is ever going to change that. However, we live in a (mostly) free world. So if you want to believe the sky is orange and there are elves that steal your socks at night, go right ahead. I won't stop you. __________________ "Ph'nglui musaglw'nanna Funkthulhu R'Omahaea wgah'basjoo fhtagn" "In his house at Omaha, dread Funkthulhu plants bananas."