I'm not ignoring them. It however seems that the rest of the APS does. And I guess it isn't only 16 scientists.
Membership 50,000
src:
American Physical Society - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Actually 16/50000 = 0.00032%
I mean, even if it was 10%, the VAST majority of the scientists is of another opinion.
I was just asking what relevance does mentioning of THAT particular scientist had, since he didn't even have specialization in Climatology. The only relevance was, that he was most probably the only Nobel Prize winner and thus his mentioning there would put some more weight to his claims in an layman's view. Even though I doubt I would find any succesful climatology paper he wrote.
And come on... some of these people can't even pretend to be specialized in climatology:
Quote:
Harrison H. Schmitt - a geologist
Why don't they leave this to real Climatologists?
And some REAL paperwork on the status quo of the scientific consensus on Global warming, Climate change and man-made global warming:
http://tinyurl.com/dehjun
Expert credibility in climate change